Question:
I got a speeding ticket in California and took a class to remove it.
A year later, I was stupid and got another. Through the usual DMV red tape, the first was never removed as it should have been. Now they tell me the first is on there because the second negates the fact that I took the class; another violation means the first can't be removed. Here's the catch:
I had a lawyer help me with the second ticket and in the process, ensure the courts would allow the class on the first.
Fines for Driving without insurance in Ontario?
Is the DMV telling full of it? Does the second violation mean the first can't be removed?
How do I clean this up if my lawyer's work if valid? I'm working with the DMV here!!
Answers:
Has the minimum driver's license change in California?
Wrong. The first was removed providing you didn't get another within 3 years. You did, so the first one gets back in place.Indeed, the second ticket does make the first class you took null and void. You screwed up. Live with it. Enjoy your insurance rates.
What's the best route to take wiht traffic ticket for not coming to a complet stop at a stop sign?
(For more serious things in CA it has a 5 year period.)
Why does the BMV request that you have insurance, yet they don't verify that you really have it?
If you took traffic school in lieu of accepting the violation, it should never have been put on your record. I suspect that the deal your lawyer got you was probation, meaning that you have to avoid another violation or the first one goes back on your record.Obviously the class did you no good, so why the h-e-doublehockeysticks should your original ticket not count? You only went to the class to decrease punishment, not to learn your lesson.
More Questions & Answers ...
This article contents is post by this website user, CarQnA.com doesn't promise its accuracy.