Question:
Going down a San Diego Freeway, a dodge Durango in front of us, approx 3-4 car lenghts. Going about 65-70mph... When all of the sudden the driver of the Durango hits his breaks, then SLAMS on his breaks, smoke from his tires is everywhere and in no time we are in an accident. CHP shows up and the driver of the Durango is irrational and argumentative, takes a fighting stance with a CHP and is arrested for a DUI and suspended licence.
Why do people drive around with their children out of the car seat?
We are all amazed to find out that CHP ruled that we were at fault? Is there no justice? I would assume that the drunk driver, (since he should have not been driving) would be the cause of this accident...Since he admitted that he hit his breaks in an attempt to get us to get away from him... Not the sober driver behind him.
Answers:
California is a pure comparative negligence state. Regarding car accidents, the law recognizes that all parties involved in a collision are at fault, rarely EVER is one person to blame. As such, each party can recover up to their legal limit. For example, in a 50/50 accident, each party can recover 50% of their damages.
What are the real-world advantages and disadvantages of anti-lock brakes (ABS)?
To answer your question, just because a driver is DUI doesn't automatically make them 100% at fault. For example: a car is stopped at a red light and this car is rear ended. The driver of the stopped car is dui. The dui guy is not at fault for being rear ended---being dui did not CONTRIBUTE to the accident.
is there any reason why i cant fit rear seats and seatbelts to my escort 55 van?
In your scenario, the guy is dui and granted he shouldn't have been on the road. However, the fact is, he WAS on the road. The CHP placed fault with you because you are the vehicle traveling behind this guy (sounds like a rear ender) and you have a duty to decrease your speed based upon roadway conditions and/or make reasonable prudent steps to avoid an accident.
If a parent gets in an auto accident while taking kids to school, can the parents sue the school?
The good news is your insurance company is required by DOI to conduct a seperate investigation into the loss; they can not go by just what the police report says. The CHP makes mistakes, they get drivers/statments confused, etc...this is why they the DOI says what it says. Also, the CHP can tell you what CVC you violated, however, they do not determine negligence--the insurance company does. Many times I have disagreed with a police report putting my insured at fault, and many times courts have agreed with me.
is buying a vehicle at auction typically a safe way to go?
No, the drunk driver is at fault not the victims.You could appeal that.
Jerking the steering wheel to the right or left can cause the vehicle to skid.?
very weird, the cop was probably just lazy to avoid calling other units, and do tests and reports and ask more questions. But if you were tailgating or whoever was driving was maybe thats why..sorry that suckshow does adding gravel on the road during ice storms help traction?
The law is sometimes a bit crazily wired.That being said, if you are following a car it is your responsability to follow safely and avoid any occurance that might take place.
this guy has been charged with DUI etc., but the other drivers are at fault with failure to drive safely.
If you know the car is weaving all over the road, then get away from it in a hurry.
Should we abolish speed limits?
In similar situations, I have been able to avoid vehicles that stop in front of me. The cops are saying you should have been able to stop, regardless of WHY the vehicle in front of you stopped suddenly.who needs to use a booster seat?
Get in touch with your insurance agent and your family lawyer to cover the bases. Obtain all police reports that relate to the accident and DUI arrest. Document EVERYTHING. You should be in the clear, as DUI usually trumps other traffic infractions.
Who has priority at a raised pedestrian crossing (not a zebra crossing)?
well you are automatically at fault in rear-enders but if he slamed his brakes for no reason then fight itwho has the right of way legally, the one turn left or turn right?
It doesnt matter, look at any insurance company's policy. If you rear-end somebody then you are at fault, whether or not they slammed on their brakes. The law says you should have enough space to stop no matter what the person in front of you does.irregardless of the other drivers drinking it is your fault, simply put, you are responsible for not stopping in time to avoid the accident. you hit him...not the other way around
What should I have in the trunk of my car?
If you rear-end anyone, ever, you are automatically at fault. You have to be in control of your vehicle. If you hit someone from behind, you will be deemed to have been following too closely. At least the guy was arrested for DUI, and it doesn't sound likely that he'll sue for personal injuries, although don't be surprised if he does.Why the object appear near in car's side mirrors?
You are ALWAYS at fault when you rear-end somebody. I know its a bum deal, but thats the law. You were or should have been cited for "failure to control speed to avoid a collision".Actual driving steps, from key started forward, any at You Tube?
its a sad injustice,but no. the law says that while this idiotshould'nt have even been behind the wheel,responsibilty for controling your car falls to you. in other words, you should have been far enough behind him to have come to a complete stop
without hitting anthing. it's not fair i know , but the system rarely is
You both got busted for doing wrong.....just reality.
thought i read somewhere that they have changed the mot test now to every 2 years,is this right ?
Rear-ending someone else makes you at fault in 99.9% of the cases.Will hot or warm water hurt your tires?
You were following too closely -- 3-4 car lengths is never enough distance to stop. The guideline is 1 car length of separation for each 10 mph.
Have you ever not hit the brakes when you got into an accident?
The scenario where you could have avoided being at-fault would be if you were rear-ended first and slammed into the car in front of you. But that's not the case you described.
Parking of Speed Camera Vans!?
If the CHP actually witnessed the accident as it happened, they might be more sympathetic to you. But you still followed Mr Durango too closely, so you would bear some responsibility.
It comes down to the fact that you were following too closely. Let your insurance company take it to court. The police report is not necessarily the last word. If you can get it in front of a jury that he was DUI, you may have a chance.
Have you ever accidentally hit an animal while driving? What happened?
You both did something wrong that lead to the accident. In almost every case, it is the car in the rear of a rear-end accident that is at fault. I know it's not fair, but that is the law.
whats rule about car window tint . i mean whats the leggal %? to whic i cab tint my car windows?
First off, ordinary traffic cops do not assign fault. Major accidents are investigated by specially trained accident investigation teams if the cause is not immediately apparent.what are the forces acting on a cab floor of an truck?
Second, if you hit him, you were following too closely. Period. The fact that he was drunk gets him a DUI, but if you had been following at a safe distance you would NOT have hit him.
Can you pass a stopped school bus if there's a median in between?
Your insurance company (and his) will determine fault. What did your insurance company say?
I sympathize with you, but from what you say, you were following way to close and the inevitable happened. At 65MPH you should have been at least 7 car lengths behind ( one car length for every 10mph). I understand that traffic often will not let you maintain a safe distance from the car in front of you, but when it comes to the law, you failed to leave yourself enough room to react, the accident is proof of that. The other driver certainly contributed, but suppose he had a legitimate reason for doing what he did and was stone cold sober, you still would have piled into him.
More Questions & Answers ...
This article contents is post by this website user, CarQnA.com doesn't promise its accuracy.